Our letter also got a mention from Robert Feder here:
Oct. 15, 2010
Federal Bankruptcy Court
Tribune Co. Board of Directors
Tribune Co. Executive Management
The board of directors of the Chicago Headline Club, the local chapter of the nationwide Society of Professional Journalists, strongly objects to the culture of offensiveness that has marginalized women at the Chicago Tribune.
In recent generations, American workplace managers presumably moved beyond sexism, racism and other forms of discrimination against employees. Yet in recent years, as the New York Times asserts in an Oct. 5 article, offensive behavior has become all too frequent among Tribune Co. management. TheTimes article is not the first time such complaints have been reported. It is, however, the largest compilation of allegations of “sexual innuendo, poisonous workplace banter and profane invective.”
Corporate rock star status and/or supposed creativity do not excuse this behavior. Nor, we might add, has a boys’ locker room attitude helped dig the Tribune Co. out of its financial hole. If anything, unacceptable treatment of employees has cost the company the loyalty and dedication of staff.
Such behavior is in violation of the Society of Professional Journalists’ Code of Ethics, which among other directives, insists that journalists be sensitive to and respectful of others. A copy of the code follows. The Chicago Headline Club condemns the misuse of power that apparently occurred at the Tribune. We applaud management for suspending one offender but also ask it to re-evaluate the corporate environment it has created and revise its staff handbook so that it can create a professional and respectful workplace that will become a model for the industry.
Susan S. Stevens
CHC president ex-officio
Howard S. Dubin
Society of Professional Journalists
Code of Ethics
Members of the Society of Professional Journalists believe that public enlightenment is the forerunner of justice and the foundation of democracy. The duty of the journalist is to further those ends by seeking truth and providing a fair and comprehensive account of events and issues. Conscientious journalists from all media and specialties strive to serve the public with thoroughness and honesty. Professional integrity is the cornerstone of a journalist’s credibility.
Members of the Society share a dedication to ethical behavior and adopt this code to declare the Society’s principles and standards of practice.
The SPJ Code of Ethics is voluntarily embraced by thousands of journalists, regardless of place or platform, and is widely used in newsrooms and classrooms as a guide for ethical behavior. The code is intended not as a set of “rules” but as a resource for ethical decision-making. It is not — nor can it be under the First Amendment — legally enforceable. The present version of the code was adopted by the 1996 SPJ National Convention, after months of study and debate among the Society’s members. Sigma Delta Chi’s first Code of Ethics was borrowed from the American Society of Newspaper Editors in 1926. In 1973, Sigma Delta Chi wrote its own code, which was revised in 1984, 1987 and 1996.
Seek Truth and Report It
Journalists should be honest, fair and courageous in gathering, reporting and interpreting information.
-Test the accuracy of information from all sources and exercise care to avoid inadvertent error. Deliberate distortion is never permissible.
– Diligently seek out subjects of news stories to give them the opportunity to respond to allegations of wrongdoing.
-Identify sources whenever feasible. The public is entitled to as much information as possible on sources’ reliability.
-Always question sources’ motives before promising anonymity. Clarify conditions attached to any promise made in exchange for information. Keep promises.
– Make certain that headlines, news teases and promotional material, photos, video, audio, graphics, sound bites and quotations do not misrepresent. They should not oversimplify or highlight incidents out of context.
– Never distort the content of news photos or video Image enhancement for technical clarity is always permissible. Label montages and photo illustrations.
– Avoid misleading re-enactments or staged news events. If re-enactment is necessary to tell a story, label it.
– Avoid undercover or other surreptitious methods of gathering information except when traditional open methods will not yield information vital to the public. Use of such methods should be explained as part of the story.
– Never plagiarize.
-Tell the story of the diversity and magnitude of the human experience boldly, even when it is unpopular to do so.
– Examine their own cultural values and avoid imposing those values on others.
– Avoid stereotyping by race, gender, age, religion, ethnicity, geography, sexual orientation, disability, physical appearance or social status.
– Support the open exchange of views, even views they find repugnant.
– Give voice to the voiceless; official and unofficial sources of information can be equally valid.
– Distinguish between advocacy and news reporting. Analysis and commentary should be labeled and not misrepresent fact or context.
– Distinguish news from advertising and shun hybrids that blur the lines between the two.
– Recognize a special obligation to ensure that the public’s business is conducted in the open and that government records are open to inspection.
Ethical journalists treat sources, subjects and colleagues as human beings deserving of respect.
– Show compassion for those who may be affected adversely by news coverage. Use special sensitivity when dealing with children and inexperienced sources or subjects.
– Be sensitive when seeking or using interviews or photographs of those affected by tragedy or grief:
– Recognize that gathering and reporting information may cause harm or discomfort.
– Pursuit of the news is not a license for arrogance.
– Recognize that private people have a greater right to control information about themselves than do public officials and others who seek power, influence or attention.
– Only an overriding public need can justify intrusion into anyone’s privacy.
– Show good taste. Avoid pandering to lurid curiosity.
– Be cautious about identifying juvenile suspects or victims of sex crimes.
– Be judicious about naming criminal suspects before the formal filing of charges.
– Balance a criminal suspect’s fair trial rights with the public’s right to be informed.
Journalists should be free of obligation to any interest other than the public’s right to know.
– Avoid conflicts of interest, real or perceived.
– Remain free of associations and activities that may compromise integrity or damage credibility.
– Refuse gifts, favors, fees, free travel and special treatment, and shun secondary employment, political involvement, public office and service in community organizations if they compromise journalistic integrity.
– Disclose unavoidable conflicts.
– Be vigilant and courageous about holding those with power accountable.
– Deny favored treatment to advertisers and special interests and resist their pressure to influence news coverage.
– Be wary of sources offering information for favors or money; avoid bidding for news.
Journalists are accountable to their readers, listeners, viewers and each other.
– Clarify and explain news coverage and invite dialogue with the public over journalistic conduct.
– Encourage the public to voice grievances against the news media.
– Admit mistakes and correct them promptly.
– Expose unethical practices of journalists and the news media.
– Abide by the same high standards to which they hold others.
cc: Gerould Kern